In order to build an enjoyable environment on a human scale, we first need to know what people enjoy, and then what they need. This combination of two variables, esthetics and functionality, is important. Even the most conceptually unique space won’t be used by normal people if it is not functional. Similarly, people will not want to spend time in an extremely spartan space that is only about function.

A building in Seattle demonstrates human
scale in its built form.
The city of Seattle has a series of design guidelines, including a section detailing how make a place human-friendly. Basically, the details are most important. Greenery to provide shade, details in building and window mouldings, awnings, and good lighting, all contribute to making a space appealing. However, all these features work together to make sure that a space does not appear too large. Awnings and moldings act as an imaginary outdoor ceiling, and trees contribute to this.
My previous blog talked about how commercial big box stores, with their giant parking lots, are just about the worst example of human scale planning in our everyday lives. How can they be better?
The fact is, the Big Box is simply too big. Before any of the detailing mentioned above can be incorporated, that box needs to be broken up into smaller, more realistically sized portions that are stacked on top of each other to a minimum of two storeys. That doesn’t mean they have to be tiny, but they shouldn’t be much deeper than a typical building in a city’s downtown. That means an average depth about 40 metres (130 feet). The Walmart store alone in your average Walmart supercentre is over 100m (330ft) deep, not to mention around 170m wide!
Reducing the horizontal size of these developments is the first step toward human scale design. Check back next time for a look at the environmental and economic reasons why modern shopping centres are way too big.